On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 6:31 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I spent some time thinking about the right way to proceed here, and I came
> up with the attached patches. The first patch just adds error checking for
> various lstat() calls in the replication code. If lstat() fails, then it
> probably doesn't make sense to try to continue processing the file.
>
> The second patch changes some nearby calls to ereport() to ERROR. If these
> failures are truly unexpected, and we don't intend to support use-cases
> like concurrent manual deletion, then failing might be the right way to go.
> I think it's a shame that such failures could cause checkpointing to
> continually fail, but that topic is already being discussed elsewhere [0].
>
> [0] https://postgr.es/m/C1EE64B0-D4DB-40F3-98C8-0CED324D34CB%40amazon.com
After an off-list discussion with Andreas, proposing here a patch that
basically replaces ReadDir call with ReadDirExtended and gets rid of
lstat entirely. With this chance, the checkpoint will only care about
the snapshot and mapping files and not fail if it finds other files in
the directories. Removing lstat enables us to make things faster as we
avoid a bunch of extra system calls - one lstat call per each mapping
or snapshot file.
This patch also includes, converting "could not parse filename" and
"could not remove file" errors to LOG messages in
CheckPointLogicalRewriteHeap. This will enable checkpoint not to waste
the amount of work that it has done in case it is unable to
parse/remove the file, for whatever reasons.
Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.