Re: Is there a way (except from server logs) to know the kind of on-going/last checkpoint?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bharath Rupireddy
Тема Re: Is there a way (except from server logs) to know the kind of on-going/last checkpoint?
Дата
Msg-id CALj2ACVM-Pu0jp+qp3CdwyLf8SuZmbxAdj4nKmifkGH0Gth4BQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Is there a way (except from server logs) to know the kind of on-going/last checkpoint?  (Sergey Dudoladov <sergey.dudoladov@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Is there a way (except from server logs) to know the kind of on-going/last checkpoint?  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Re: Is there a way (except from server logs) to know the kind of on-going/last checkpoint?  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 3:23 PM Sergey Dudoladov
<sergey.dudoladov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here's v2, rebased onto the latest master.
>
> I've reviewed this patch. The patch builds against the master (commit
> e9d4001ec592bcc9a3332547cb1b0211e8794f38) and passes all the tests.
> The patch does what it intends to do, namely store the kind of the
> last checkpoint in the control file and display it in the output of
> the pg_control_checkpoint() function and pg_controldata utility.
> I did not test it with restartpoints though. Speaking of the torn
> writes, the size of the control file with this patch applied does not
> exceed 8Kb.

Thanks for the review.

> A few code comments:
>
> + char ckpt_kind[2 * MAXPGPATH];
>
> I don't completely understand why 2 * MAXPGPATH is used here for the
> buffer size.
> [1] defines MAXPGPATH to be standard size of a pathname buffer. How
> does it relate to ckpt_kind ?

I was using it loosely. Changed in the v3 patch.

> + ControlFile->checkPointKind = 0;
>
> It is worth a comment that 0 is unknown, as for instance in [2]

We don't even need ControlFile->checkPointKind = 0; because
InitControlFile will memset(ControlFile, 0, sizeof(ControlFileData));,
hence removed this.

> + (flags == 0) ? "unknown" : "",
>
> That reads as if this patch would introduce a new "unknown" checkpoint state.
> Why have it here at all if after for example initdb the kind is "shutdown" ?

Yeah, even LogCheckpointStart doesn't have anything "unknown" so removed it.

> The space at the strings' end (as in "wait " or "immediate ")
> introduces extra whitespace in the output of pg_control_checkpoint().
> A similar check at [3] places whitespace differently; that arrangement
> of whitespace should remove the issue.

Changed.

> >       Datum           values[18];
> >       bool            nulls[18];
>
> You forgot to expand these arrays.

Not sure what you meant here. The size of the array is already 19 in v2.

> This breaks checkpoint file format. Need to bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION,
> and pg_upgrade need to treat the change.

I added a note in the commit message to bump cat version so that the
committer will take care of it.

> -  proallargtypes => '{pg_lsn,pg_lsn,text,int4,int4,bool,text,oid,xid,xid,xid,oid,xid,xid,oid,xid,xid,timestamptz}',
> +  proallargtypes =>
'{pg_lsn,pg_lsn,text,int4,int4,bool,text,oid,xid,xid,xid,oid,xid,xid,oid,xid,xid,timestamptz,text}',
>
> I think the additional column should be text[] instead of text, but
> not sure.

We are preparing a single string of all the checkpoint kinds and
outputting as a text column, so we don't need text[].

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is it correct to update db state in control file as "shutting down" during end-of-recovery checkpoint?
Следующее
От: Bharath Rupireddy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes