Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Borisov
Тема Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators
Дата
Msg-id CALT9ZEE3jHRk4be3bq6swsUimU9OKVPBJdq49Z2RkXSwVthHEQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators  (Emre Hasegeli <emre@hasegeli.com>)
Ответы Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
 
The subject is about the documentation, but the post reveals
inconsistencies of the operators.  Tom Lane fixed the documentation on
the back branches.  The new patch is to fix the operators on the
master only.

Nice catch, thanks!
I agree that different operators should not have the same name and I'm planning to review the patch soon. What are your ideas on the possibility to backpatch it also? It seems a little bit weird that the operator can change its name between versions of PG. 
--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov

Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Split copy.c
Следующее
От: Jakub Wartak
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: automatic analyze: readahead - add "IO read time" log message