On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 at 07:28, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 00:24, Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, hackers!
> > In the measurements above in the thread, I've been using LIFO wake
> > queue in a primary lockless patch (and it was attached as the previous
> > versions of a patch) and an "inverted wake queue" (in faсt FIFO) as
> > the alternative benchmarking option. I think using the latter is more
> > fair and natural and provided they show no difference in the speed,
> > I'd make the main patch using it (attached as v6). No other changes
> > from v5, though.
>
> There has not been much interest on this as the thread has been idle
> for more than a year now. I'm not sure if we should take it forward or
> not. I would prefer to close this in the current commitfest unless
> someone wants to take it further.
I have returned this patch in commitfest as nobody had shown any
interest in pursuing it. Feel free to add a new entry when someone
wants to work on this more actively.
Regards,
Vignesh