On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 00:24, Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, hackers!
> In the measurements above in the thread, I've been using LIFO wake
> queue in a primary lockless patch (and it was attached as the previous
> versions of a patch) and an "inverted wake queue" (in faсt FIFO) as
> the alternative benchmarking option. I think using the latter is more
> fair and natural and provided they show no difference in the speed,
> I'd make the main patch using it (attached as v6). No other changes
> from v5, though.
There has not been much interest on this as the thread has been idle
for more than a year now. I'm not sure if we should take it forward or
not. I would prefer to close this in the current commitfest unless
someone wants to take it further.
Regards,
Vignesh