Should pgAdmin 3 be saved?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Gabriel Martin
Тема Should pgAdmin 3 be saved?
Дата
Msg-id CAKzNfLQFhdF7+05Q0NpQFM8Q9fxaagcZS-mci2DuvwDDgsFUYw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Should pgAdmin 3 be saved?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Should pgAdmin 3 be saved?  (Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Hello,

I know that since the launch of pgAdmin 4 in 2016, pgAdmin has been using a web-based model, as announced as early as 2014. You only need to do a little research on the Web to understand all the reasons behind this choice, which I do not seek to question.

However, I wonder if it would be relevant to keep pgAdmin 3 alive. I'm not so much talking about improving the interface of pgAdmin 3, but simply about keeping the software functional in new systems. I tried to install it in the latest versions of Linux Mint and Ubuntu, but the software keeps bugging, which it didn't do in older versions of the same systems 5 or 6 years ago.

Do you think there's a possibility that people could fix pgAdmin 3, even if it means making a fork or whatever? Because, although pgAdmin 4 and other tools such as OmniDB and DBeaver are probably excellent, some people, for various reasons, might want to continue using pgAdmin 3 in 2021. I'm not an expert in the field, but I'm thinking that maybe someone here might be able to save this nice little application software from disappearing by investing a few days to maintain it.

Thank you for your time,

GM

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ron
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: vacuumdb not letting me connect to db
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should pgAdmin 3 be saved?