Re: Should pgAdmin 3 be saved?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ian Lawrence Barwick
Тема Re: Should pgAdmin 3 be saved?
Дата
Msg-id CAB8KJ=hYbjo7_7QDOvcvrXqQ1w=4kxaZfN6DatNP6hgWhWcBMw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Should pgAdmin 3 be saved?  (Gabriel Martin <grafik.muzik@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general


2021年2月7日(日) 4:07 Gabriel Martin <grafik.muzik@gmail.com>:
Hello,

I know that since the launch of pgAdmin 4 in 2016, pgAdmin has been using a web-based model, as announced as early as 2014. You only need to do a little research on the Web to understand all the reasons behind this choice, which I do not seek to question.

However, I wonder if it would be relevant to keep pgAdmin 3 alive. I'm not so much talking about improving the interface of pgAdmin 3, but simply about keeping the software functional in new systems. I tried to install it in the latest versions of Linux Mint and Ubuntu, but the software keeps bugging, which it didn't do in older versions of the same systems 5 or 6 years ago.

Do you think there's a possibility that people could fix pgAdmin 3, even if it means making a fork or whatever? Because, although pgAdmin 4 and other tools such as OmniDB and DBeaver are probably excellent, some people, for various reasons, might want to continue using pgAdmin 3 in 2021. I'm not an expert in the field, but I'm thinking that maybe someone here might be able to save this nice little application software from disappearing by investing a few days to maintain it.
 
FWIW there is a fork here which is making some attempt to keep it up-to-date
with recent PostgreSQL versions:

    https://github.com/AbdulYadi/pgadmin3

Regards

Ian Barwick

--

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should pgAdmin 3 be saved?
Следующее
От: Rushikesh socha
Дата:
Сообщение: Postgres NOSQL Benchmarking