Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Luca Ferrari
Тема Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?
Дата
Msg-id CAKoxK+57m-8pugYke+BYhYtPn4YYNJgzU8g21aMykEZmMdQgQw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:33 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can see most obvious reasons at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247477

Thanks, I didn't see the lost+found problem because I'm on UFS (I'm
wondering if this applies also to ZFS datasetes with mount point).
Same story for the accidentally umount, since FreeBSD seems enough
friendly to avoid umount while the database is running, but it could
definetely happen with some brute force or on another operating
system.
I see the upgrade problem being a lot more general in this sense.
However, all are good points.

Luca


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: why not using a mountpoint as PGDATA?
Следующее
От: Achilleas Mantzios
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Barman disaster recovery solution