On 4 September 2018 at 19:31, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2018/08/24 7:22, David Rowley wrote:
>> On 24 August 2018 at 02:26, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> One of the patches I sent last week does the same thing, among a
>>> couple of other things with regard to handling relations in the
>>> executor. On a cursory look at the patch, your take of it looks
>>> better than mine. Will test tomorrow. Here is a link to my email:
>>>
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e688@lab.ntt.co.jp
>>>
>>> 4th of my patches implements the array'fication of executor's range table.
>>
>> Sorry, didn't realise. I'll withdraw this and review yours during the
>> upcoming 'fest.
>
> Since your patch implemented the idea in a better manner, I'm thinking I
> should merge it with mine. Is that okay with you?
Feel free to do that. I've not yet looked at your patch. I was
planning on looking at your partition planning performance
improvements patches first.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services