On 2018/09/04 17:14, David Rowley wrote:
> On 4 September 2018 at 19:31, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> On 2018/08/24 7:22, David Rowley wrote:
>>> On 24 August 2018 at 02:26, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> One of the patches I sent last week does the same thing, among a
>>>> couple of other things with regard to handling relations in the
>>>> executor. On a cursory look at the patch, your take of it looks
>>>> better than mine. Will test tomorrow. Here is a link to my email:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e688@lab.ntt.co.jp
>>>>
>>>> 4th of my patches implements the array'fication of executor's range table.
>>>
>>> Sorry, didn't realise. I'll withdraw this and review yours during the
>>> upcoming 'fest.
>>
>> Since your patch implemented the idea in a better manner, I'm thinking I
>> should merge it with mine. Is that okay with you?
>
> Feel free to do that.
Okay, will do.
> I've not yet looked at your patch. I was
> planning on looking at your partition planning performance
> improvements patches first.
Great, thanks.
Regards,
Amit