Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Дата
Msg-id CAKJS1f_EZ3jHUDH1zxdauaq_2BGPjpzxJ-noMGfFuz3EehaC3g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
While looking at the docs in [1], I saw that we still mention:

4. Ensure that the constraint_exclusion configuration parameter is not
disabled in postgresql.conf. If it is, queries will not be optimized
as desired.

This is no longer true. The attached patch removed it.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/ddl-partitioning.html

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Следующее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least9.5)?