Re: Postgres views cannot use both union and join/where

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: Postgres views cannot use both union and join/where
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwbGL65YosG0wgXCDcijJv8JYjLHdo8fyukS2GFi9uXf1g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Postgres views cannot use both union and join/where  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 6:58 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tuesday, October 19, 2021, Michael Lewis <mlewis@entrata.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 3:48 PM Mithran Kulasekaran <
>> mithranakulasekaran@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> create  view template_view (id, name, description, is_staged) as
>>> select t.id,t.name, t.description, false as is_staged
>>> from template t
>>> left join template_staging ts on t.name = ts.name and ts.name is null

>> Does that work? I've only seen that type of logic written as-
>> left join template_staging ts on t.name = ts.name
>> where ts.name is null

> The are functionally equivalent, though the timing of the expression
> evaluation differs slightly.

No, not at all.  Michael's version correctly implements an anti-join,
where the first version does not.  The reason is that the WHERE clause
"sees" the column value post-JOIN, whereas the JOIN/ON clause "sees"
values pre-JOIN.

Yeah, my bad.  I was actually thinking this but then figured the OP wouldn't have written an anti-join that didn't actually work.

My original email was going to be:

Adding the single table expression to the ON clause is shorthand for writing:

SELECT t.* FROM template AS t LEFT JOIN (SELECT * FROM template_staging WHERE template_staging.name IS NULL) AS ts ON t.name = ts.name;

David J.

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgres views cannot use both union and join/where
Следующее
От: Ninad Shah
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Query out of memory