Re: Postgres views cannot use both union and join/where

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Postgres views cannot use both union and join/where
Дата
Msg-id 2133339.1634738335@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Postgres views cannot use both union and join/where  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Postgres views cannot use both union and join/where  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tuesday, October 19, 2021, Michael Lewis <mlewis@entrata.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 3:48 PM Mithran Kulasekaran <
>> mithranakulasekaran@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> create  view template_view (id, name, description, is_staged) as
>>> select t.id,t.name, t.description, false as is_staged
>>> from template t
>>> left join template_staging ts on t.name = ts.name and ts.name is null

>> Does that work? I've only seen that type of logic written as-
>> left join template_staging ts on t.name = ts.name
>> where ts.name is null

> The are functionally equivalent, though the timing of the expression
> evaluation differs slightly.

No, not at all.  Michael's version correctly implements an anti-join,
where the first version does not.  The reason is that the WHERE clause
"sees" the column value post-JOIN, whereas the JOIN/ON clause "sees"
values pre-JOIN.

Assuming that the '=' operator is strict, the first query's ON clause
really reduces to constant false, so that you just get a null-extended
image of the left table.  That's almost surely not what's wanted.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ashkil Dighin
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Lock contention high
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgres views cannot use both union and join/where