Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwauhGRnwqGamn6oHrdP-3v2SR0ELhe_a3w0BtjpkV5q_g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins  (Jürgen Purtz <juergen@purtz.de>)
Ответы Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 1:15 PM Jürgen Purtz <juergen@purtz.de> wrote:
On 30.11.20 20:45, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
> As far as I see something got committed and now the discussion is stuck in arguing about parenthesis.
> FWIW, I think it is a matter of personal taste. Maybe we can compromise on simply leaving this part unchanged.

With or without parenthesis is a little more than a personal taste, but
it's a very tiny detail. I'm happy with either of the two variants.


Sorry, I managed to overlook the most recent patch.

I admitted my use of parentheses was incorrect and I don't see anyone else defending them.  Please remove them.

Minor typos:

"the database compare" -> needs an "s" (compares)

"In this case, the definition how to compare their rows." -> remove, redundant with the first sentence

"The results from the older implicit syntax, and the newer explicit JOIN/ON syntax, are identical" -> move the commas around to what is shown here

David J.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Anastasia Lubennikova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [patch] [doc] Introduce view updating options more succinctly
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: range_agg