Re: "Keyed" sequence?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: "Keyed" sequence?
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwanUCZYVHCk+gnoqnHHsm_4_z-O6EXVYdH6u=7y6uCo6g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: "Keyed" sequence?  (Israel Brewster <israel@ravnalaska.net>)
Ответы Re: "Keyed" sequence?
Список pgsql-general
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Israel Brewster <israel@ravnalaska.net> wrote:

>
> It'll kill your performance, but if aesthetics are that important to you...

They're not *that* important. I was just asking if there was a way to do this easily.

​While the performance argument might be true it is heavily dependent upon concurrency.  I'm doubting a PO system in the typical company has enough concurrency, and is sensitivity enough to small delays,​
 
​that giving up the benefit of sequential numbering would be a worthwhile trade-off.

David J.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Israel Brewster
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: "Keyed" sequence?
Следующее
От: Israel Brewster
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: "Keyed" sequence?