> > I'll also note that, unless I missed something, we also have to consider > > that the capability to pipeline results is still only available in the > > target list. > > Yes, we would definitely want to improve nodeFunctionscan.c to perform > better for ValuePerCall SRFs. But that has value independently of this.
Ah, so that's what "pipeline results" mean! I hadn't gotten that. I agree; Abhijit had a patch or a plan for this, a long time ago ...
Is this sidebar strictly an implementation detail, not user visible?