Re: dumb question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: dumb question
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwZeDWL1xp8oab1rXHKoXpbMOaYbfheRKsOZ=LdjcjRdgw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: dumb question  (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>)
Ответы Re: dumb question  (Steve Clark <steve.clark@netwolves.com>)
Re: dumb question  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Re: dumb question  (Steve Clark <steve.clark@netwolves.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Felipe Santos <felipepts@gmail.com> wrote:
I think sts=0 means ref_id is null

So, what I think he wants to achieve is:

select max(id) from yourtable where sts=0 and id not in (select ref_id from yourtable);

Isn't it?

The OP will need to explain further as we are all guessing. As I mentioned in my earlier (accidental top - curses GMail) post, table structures and the query or queries that don't work would be useful. So would a description of the problem that is being solved since there could be better approaches.


​Maybe we mis-interpreted but as written this is the solution.  My out-loud thinking was a more verbose version of this.​
 

​David J.​

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Steve Crawford
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dumb question
Следующее
От: rverghese
Дата:
Сообщение: Partitioned tables do not return affected row counts to client