Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwYyhSQ764tT8cm8HkFeuEsN6d+La=S-wnKFAeZEMWVrmw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:20 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm about to unleash new versions of the above and related functions
> (args will change), so a drops are imminent. Any reason to hold off on that?

While I've not yet looked at the code, I've got no reason to think
this is anything except fragile argument parsing in \df and \sf.


I'm unsure about the "extra argument ignored" bit but the rest of "not found" issues are due to operator error; specifying a pattern that tries to match the name and arguments at the same time when that isn't how the meta-command is defined to be used.

David J.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade
Следующее
От: Rob Sargent
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade