Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade
Дата
Msg-id 1799103.1650057624@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade  (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения 
Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm about to unleash new versions of the above and related functions 
> (args will change), so a drops are imminent. Any reason to hold off on that?

While I've not yet looked at the code, I've got no reason to think
this is anything except fragile argument parsing in \df and \sf.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade