Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value?
| От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKAnmmJHe5iHDQwFJf0t6DuBMFJoxotP-njEo=Y8NgCyoGi-hA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value? (Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 3:15 PM Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com> wrote:
One of the take-away lessons from this thread for me is that the TPC-* benchmarks are far removed from real world queries. (Maybe if we ask an LLM to use an ORM to implement TPC-H? Ha ha ha!)
To be clear, I'm saying that TPC queries are written by sane adults that know what they are doing, but perhaps lowering rpc tends to help more when the queries are not well-written SQL (which many consultants would argue is the majority of production queries).
Cheers,
Greg
--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: