On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Maxim Boguk <maxim.boguk@gmail.com> writes:
> >> I know GIST on intarray[] do not have that problem.
> >> Very likely the problem is limited to intarray[] GIN indexes only
> >> (but I going to test some other not-well known GIN indexes tomorrow).
> >
> >> Broken FTS indexes on Hot Standby should be known years before.
> >
> > You might think that, but you'd be wrong :-(.
>
> Yes, that did sound ominous.
>
> > ginRedoUpdateMetapage
> > is failing to restore the contents of the pending-list correctly,
> > which means this is broken for all types of GIN indexes. Will fix.
>
> Great detective work Tom as ever, much appreciated.
>
>
Thank you very much.
Is that fix will be included to the next minor versions releases?
(especially into 9.1.2)?
--
Maxim Boguk
Senior Postgresql DBA.