Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Haribabu Kommi
Тема Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max
Дата
Msg-id CAJrrPGf+ekceZWh6xGVd0M-8xE+hSe17ynOO+Y9BuBZ77iaJUw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max  (Asif Naeem <anaeem.it@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max  (Asif Naeem <anaeem.it@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Asif Naeem <anaeem.it@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for not being clear, above mentioned test is related to following doc (sgml) changes that seems not working as
describedi.e. 
>
> Table 9-35. cidr and inet Functions
>
> FunctionReturn TypeDescriptionExampleResult
>
> max(inet, inet) inetlarger of two inet typesmax('192.168.1.5', '192.168.1.4')192.168.1.5
> min(inet, inet) inetsmaller of two inet typesmin('192.168.1.5', '192.168.1.4')192.168.1.4
>
> Can you please elaborate these sgml change ?

I thought of adding them for newly added "network" functions but
mistakenly I kept the names as max and min.
Anyway with your suggestion in the earlier mail, these changes are not required.

I removed these changes in the attached patch.
Thanks for reviewing the patch.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback