From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com]
> I really dislike having both target_sesion_attrs and
> target_server_type. It doesn't solve any actual problem. master,
> slave, prefer-save, or whatever you like could be put in
> target_session_attrs just as easily, and then we wouldn't end up with
> two keywords doing closely related things. 'master' is no more or
> less a server attribute than 'read-write'.
Hmm, that may be OK. At first, I felt it strange to treat the server type (primary or standby) as a session attribute. But we can see the server type as one attribute in a sense that a session is established for. I'm inclined to agree with:
target_session_attr = {any | read-write | read-only | prefer-read | primary | standby | prefer-standby}
Thanks for your suggestions.
Based on the above new options that can be added to target_session_attrs,
primary - it is just an alias to the read-write option.
standby, prefer-standby - These options should check whether server is running in recovery mode or not
instead of checking whether server accepts read-only connections or not?
Regards,
Haribabu Kommi
Fujitsu Australia