RE: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
От | Tsunakawa, Takayuki |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FBE249B@G01JPEXMBYT05 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com] > I really dislike having both target_sesion_attrs and > target_server_type. It doesn't solve any actual problem. master, > slave, prefer-save, or whatever you like could be put in > target_session_attrs just as easily, and then we wouldn't end up with > two keywords doing closely related things. 'master' is no more or > less a server attribute than 'read-write'. Hmm, that may be OK. At first, I felt it strange to treat the server type (primary or standby) as a session attribute. But we can see the server type as one attribute in a sense that a session is established for. I'm inclined to agree with: target_session_attr = {any | read-write | read-only | prefer-read | primary | standby | prefer-standby} Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: