Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От John Naylor
Тема Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data
Дата
Msg-id CAJVSVGV=0XjMcJNNNahAKPZFVY4ZEcxwkXR+vb2pwuwgrmd8pg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data  (John Naylor <jcnaylor@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 4/6/18, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> I don't think there's any great need to incorporate this into your patch
> set.  As far as I'm concerned, v14 is ready as-is, and I'll just apply
> this over the top of it.  (Note that I'll probably smash the whole thing
> to one commit when the time comes.)

Glad to hear it. A couple recent commits added #define symbols to
headers, which broke the patchset, so I've attached v15, diff'd
against 4f813c7203e. Commit 9fdb675fc added a symbol to pg_opfamily.h
where there were none before, so I went ahead and wrapped it with an
EXPOSE_TO_CLIENT_CODE macro.

All your additional patches apply still apply over it. Your SGML patch
can only apply if my doc patch is not applied, but I've included it
anyway for the sake of no surprises.

I'll check back in 24 hours to see if everything still applies.

-John Naylor

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning