Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Aleksander Alekseev
Тема Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable
Дата
Msg-id CAJ7c6TPqVtNVB+dk=uRMrHx+t-e+JRprdBfpd6s2TeLw+QWTew@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Hi John,

By looking at timestamptz_bin() implementation I don't see why it
should be STABLE. Its return value depends only on the input values.
It doesn't look at the session parameters. timestamptz_in() and
timestamptz_out() are STABLE, that's true, but this is no concern of
timestamptz_bin().

Am I missing something?

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Parallel Inserts (WAS: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks..)
Следующее
От: Yugo NAGATA
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fix around conn_duration in pgbench