Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable

John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 3:07 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Yeah, you need to bump catversion.

> Done, thanks for confirming.

For future reference --- I think it's potentially confusing to use
the same catversion number in different branches, except for the
short time after a new branch where the initial catalog contents
are actually identical.  So the way I'd have done this is to use
202108311 in the back branch and 202108312 in HEAD.  It's not
terribly important, but something to note for next time.

            regards, tom lane