Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example

Hi,

> The patch changes the order to:
>
>     StartTransactionCommand();
>     PushActiveSnapshot(...);
>     SPI_connect();
>
>     ...
>
>     SPI_finish();
>     PopActiveSnapshot();
>     CommitTransactionCommand();
>
> ... and also clarifies that the order of PushActiveSnapshot(...) and
> SPI_connect() is not important.

Additionally I noticed that the check:

```
        if (!process_shared_preload_libraries_in_progress)
                return;
```

... was misplaced in _PG_init(). Here is the patch v2 which fixes this too.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev