Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Julien Rouhaud
Тема
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example
Дата
Msg-id
20230603111547.khnaf7rzo4ydy3ys@jrouhaud
Ответ на
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example (Aleksander Alekseev)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com> 
On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 02:09:26PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
>
> Additionally I noticed that the check:
>
> ```
>         if (!process_shared_preload_libraries_in_progress)
>                 return;
> ```
>
> ... was misplaced in _PG_init(). Here is the patch v2 which fixes this too.

I'm pretty sure that this is intentional.  The worker can be launched
dynamically and in that case it still needs a GUC for the naptime.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
Предыдущее
От: Aleksander Alekseev
Дата:
Следующее
От: Aleksander Alekseev
Дата:
FAQ