On 4 September 2017 at 07:43, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 31 August 2017 at 14:15, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Dilip. I am working on rebasing the patch. Particularly, the
>>> partition walker in my patch depended on the fact that all the tables
>>> get opened (and then closed) while creating the tuple routing info.
>>> But in HEAD, now only the partitioned tables get opened. So need some
>>> changes in my patch.
>>>
>>> The partition walker related changes are going to be inapplicable once
>>> the other thread [1] commits the changes for expansion of inheritence
>>> in bound-order, but till then I would have to rebase the partition
>>> walker changes over HEAD.
>>>
>>> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0118a1f2-84bb-19a7-b906-dec040a206f2%40lab.ntt.co.jp
>>>
>>
>> After recent commit 30833ba154, now the partitions are expanded in
>> depth-first order. It didn't seem worthwhile rebasing my partition
>> walker changes onto the latest code. So in the attached patch, I have
>> removed all the partition walker changes.
>>
>
> It seems you have forgotten to attach the patch.
Oops sorry. Now attached.
--
Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers