On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 at 01:19, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> I did some performance testing on 0001+0002 here, and found that
> for me, there's basically no change on x86_64 but a win of 2 to 3
> percent on aarch64, using Pavel's pi_est_1() as a representative
> case for simple plpgsql statements. That squares with your original
> results I believe. It's not clear to me whether any of the later
> tests in this thread measured these changes in isolation, or only
> with 0003 added.
Yeah I had the same observation. 0001+0002 seems to benefit mostly on
aarch64. And 0003 (exec_case_value) benefited both on amd64 and
aarch64.
>
> Anyway, that's good enough for me, so I pushed 0001+0002 after a
> little bit of additional cosmetic tweaking.
>
> I attach your original 0003 here (it still applies, with some line
> offsets). That's just so the cfbot doesn't get confused about what
> it's supposed to test now.
Thanks for pushing all the three !
Thanks,
-Amit Khandekar
Huawei Technologies