Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Khandekar
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation
Дата
Msg-id CAJ3gD9c2ZJMVcsQA_6L4RmFuqdYW98BAFwL0SJ-K8YWmfCpuBA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation  (Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 24 March 2017 at 13:11, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
<rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I have given patch on latest pg sources (on commit
> 457a4448732881b5008f7a3bcca76fc299075ac3). configure and make all
> install ran successfully, but initdb failed with below error.

> FailedAssertion("!(LWLockTranchesAllocated >=
> LWTRANCHE_FIRST_USER_DEFINED)", File: "lwlock.c", Line: 501)

Thanks for reporting, Rajkumar.

With the new PARALLEL_APPEND tranche ID, LWTRANCHE_FIRST_USER_DEFINED
value has crossed the value 64. So we need to increase the initial
size of LWLockTrancheArray from 64 to 128. Attached is the updated
patch.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] segfault in hot standby for hash indexes
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pageinspect and hash indexes