Re: [HACKERS] segfault in hot standby for hash indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Kapila
Тема Re: [HACKERS] segfault in hot standby for hash indexes
Дата
Msg-id CAA4eK1JPWawfhB655sM9CBxcWNB2hYXPTkFN1JhmYeNqCP+SaA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] segfault in hot standby for hash indexes  (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Re: segfault in hot standby for hash indexes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think it would have been probably okay to use *int* for ntuples as
>> that matches with what you are actually assigning in the function.
>
> okay, corrected it. Attached is newer version of patch.
>

Thanks, this version looks good to me.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation
Следующее
От: Amit Khandekar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation