On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
>> I suspect (but haven't had time to prove and may not for several days
>> -- unfortunately going on vacation momentarily) that this might be
>> caused by pl/sh.
>
> Hm. =A0The reported symptoms might be explainable if something had caused
> multiple threads to become active within the backend process --- then
> it would be plausible for it to try to do proc_exit cleanup twice.
> Which would explain the first two errors, though I'm not sure how that
> leads to failing to disown the process latch, as the third error
> suggests must have happened. =A0But I don't know enough about pl/sh to
> know if it could cause threading activation.
>
>> In particular, we have a routine that was
>> inadvertently applied to the database in with windows cr/lf instead of
>> the normal linux newline.
>
> This doesn't seem real promising as an explanation ...
right -- just a suspicion. maybe the relevant point was that it
immediately failed. operator invoking the busted routine (which I had
to fix) and the crash were highly correlated, although it does not
always crash. yesterday was very heavy load and today not so much.
merlin