Re: [PATCH] Reuse Workers and Replication Slots during Logical Replication

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:19 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 4:09 PM Melih Mutlu <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > PFA an updated version with some of the earlier reviews addressed.
> > Forgot to include them in the previous email.
> >
>
> It is always better to explicitly tell which reviews are addressed but
> anyway, I have done some minor cleanup in the 0001 patch including
> removing includes which didn't seem necessary, modified a few
> comments, and ran pgindent. I also thought of modifying some variable
> names based on suggestions by Peter Smith in an email [1] but didn't
> find many of them any better than the current ones so modified just a
> few of those. If you guys are okay with this then let's commit it and
> then we can focus more on the remaining patches.
>

I checked the latest patch v25-0001.

LGTM.

~~

BTW, I have re-tested many cases of HEAD versus HEAD+v25-0001 (using
current test scripts previously mentioned in this thread). Because
v25-0001 is only a refactoring patch we expect that the results should
be the same as for HEAD, and that is what I observed.

------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia