Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+PuvfZRZBDJOAX7OAv2Bh2Es6xugXwW=iKticN5PgoQcCw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 2:50 AM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 6:17 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > While revisiting some old threads, I found this one that seemed to > > reach a conclusion, but then it seemed nothing happened. > > > > After multiple suggestions AFAICT James preferred the docs [1] > > modification suggested [2] by Laurenz. > > > > Should we make a CF entry for this with the status RfC, or was the > > whole thing abandoned for some reason? > > > > ====== > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/logical-replication-publication.html > > [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAaqYe91iO3dfUnVmBs4M-4aUX_zHmPN72ELE7c_8qAO_toPmA%40mail.gmail.com > > > > Kind Regards, > > Peter Smith. > > Fujitsu Australia > > Yes, I would appreciate it moving forward. > > Did you want to create the CF entry or should I? > I did it. See here: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/51/5445/ marked it as Ready for Committer. I was unsure whether to record the author as you (the thread author) or as Laurenz (the favoured patch author) so I just left some fields blank. ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: