Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING
От | James Coleman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAAaqYe9NzWBZTZ04aavj2Uow+3b3cC8Qa-r1n8jOqZ8sv5CVYQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 6:17 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > While revisiting some old threads, I found this one that seemed to > reach a conclusion, but then it seemed nothing happened. > > After multiple suggestions AFAICT James preferred the docs [1] > modification suggested [2] by Laurenz. > > Should we make a CF entry for this with the status RfC, or was the > whole thing abandoned for some reason? > > ====== > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/logical-replication-publication.html > [2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAaqYe91iO3dfUnVmBs4M-4aUX_zHmPN72ELE7c_8qAO_toPmA%40mail.gmail.com > > Kind Regards, > Peter Smith. > Fujitsu Australia Yes, I would appreciate it moving forward. Did you want to create the CF entry or should I? Regards, James Coleman
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: