Same concerns as Phil's reply. Are the numbers in pg_stat_all_tables not part of what autovacuum looks at? I assume those numbers would be updated by autoanalyze but if that only kicks in at 10% scale factor then that wouldn't happen for a while either? Seems like there's a huge disconnect here, or I just don't have my head around this properly. Or both.
Don.
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
On 08/28/2017 08:43 AM, Don Seiler wrote: > PostgreSQL 9.2.18. I have a table with 71M rows (via select count). In > pg_stat_activity, n_live_tups is 170K, n_dead_tups is slightly more than > that (203K). The autovacuum parameter is on, the scale factor is 0.2 > (default) and threshold is 50 (default), autovacuum_max_workers is 3. > There are no custom autovacuum thresholds set for this table. The > last_autovacuum field is null.
<snip> > Wondering why my autovacuum daemon appears to be acting lazily?
Autovac will kick in at (threshold + (scale_factor x 71M)), i.e. about 14.2 million dead rows. You are currently nowhere close to that.
That said, the default scale_factor is not good to such a large table. Reduce it significantly. I often will find it necessary to use custom values for large tables. One strategy I have used is scale_factor = 0 and threshold = <num_dead_rows_max_desired>. Joe
-- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development