Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost
Дата
Msg-id CAHGQGwFMNyMVh6iCVPxP85XmqxBHvHCvY28XSB5_aodjCM0_FA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +DATA = pg_stat_statements--1.1.sql pg_stat_statements--1.0--1.1.sql \
>> +       pg_stat_statements--unpackaged--1.0.sql
>>
>> Though I'm not familiar with CREATE EXTENSION. Why did you exclude 1.0.sql
>> from DATA? In hstore/Makefile, 1.0.sql is included. You think we should prevent
>> old version (i.e., 1.0) of pg_stat_statements from being used in 9.2?
>
> I'm not sure.  My feeling is that we probably don't want to ship all
> the old scripts forever.  People should install the latest version,
> and use the upgrade scripts to get there if they have an older one.
> So my gut feeling here is to change hstore to exclude that file rather
> than adding it here.  Any other opinions?

Agreed. But I wonder why VERSION option is usable in CREATE EXTENSION
if people always should use the latest version. Maybe I'm missing something..
Anyway, shipping v1.0 of pg_stat_statement seems less useful in 9.2, so
I agree to exclude it.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2