Re: PATCH: standby crashed when replay block which truncated instandby but failed to truncate in master node

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: PATCH: standby crashed when replay block which truncated instandby but failed to truncate in master node
Дата
Msg-id CAHGQGwE-USUvr-OY7_Lc_Bjk2--o_0mBWKAhvvHQ__WK=oj8GA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PATCH: standby crashed when replay block which truncated instandby but failed to truncate in master node  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: PATCH: standby crashed when replay block which truncated instandby but failed to truncate in master node  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:39 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 05:54:40PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:57 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:49:34PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > > > But this can cause subsequent recovery to always fail with invalid-pages error
> > > > and the server not to start up. This is bad. So, to allviate the situation,
> > > > I'm thinking it would be worth adding something like igore_invalid_pages
> > > > developer parameter. When this parameter is set to true, the startup process
> > > > always ignores invalid-pages errors. Thought?
> > >
> > > That could be helpful.
> >
> > So attached patch adds new developer GUC "ignore_invalid_pages".
> > Setting ignore_invalid_pages to true causes the system
> > to ignore the failure (but still report a warning), and continue recovery.
> >
> > I will add this to next CommitFest.
>
> No actual objections against this patch from me as a dev option.

Thanks for the review! Attached is the updated version of the patch.

> +        Detection of WAL records having references to invalid pages during
> +        recovery causes <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> to report
> +        an error, aborting the recovery. Setting
> Well, that's not really an error.  This triggers a PANIC, aka crashes
> the server.  And in this case the actual problem is that you may not
> be able to move on with recovery when restarting the server again,
> except if luck is on your side because you would continuously face
> it..

So you're thinking that "report an error" should be changed to
"trigger a PANIC"? Personally "report an error" sounds ok because
PANIC is one of "error", I think. But if that misleads people,
I will change the sentence.

> +        recovery. This behavior may <emphasis>cause crashes, data loss,
> +         propagate or hide corruption, or other serious problems</emphasis>.
> Nit: indentation on the second line here.

Yes, I fixed that.

> +        However, it may allow you to get past the error, finish the recovery,
> +        and cause the server to start up.
> For consistency here I would suggest the second part of the sentence
> to be "TO finish recovery, and TO cause the server to start up".

Yes, I fixed that.

> +        The default setting is off, and it can only be set at server start.
> Nit^2: Missing a <literal> markup for "off"?

Yes, I fixed that.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Wrong assert in TransactionGroupUpdateXidStatus