Re: Are the estimates made for number of pages accurate
| От | Sai Sadashiva Kundurmutt |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Are the estimates made for number of pages accurate |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAH6hFGKBBqKX7HSi9+guMUcn7h_ELQUQKkwCu3N8ug-=xi02+g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Are the estimates made for number of pages accurate (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-admin |
Thank you for clearing my doubts.
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 at 22:11, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Sai Sadashiva Kundurmutt <saisadashiva2000@gmail.com> writes:
> I wanted to know whether the numbers calculated by ANALYZE for number of
> pages are exact(the relpages field in pg_class).
If memory serves, relpages is accurate as of the time of the last
VACUUM or ANALYZE on the table, but of course it could be arbitrarily
out of date later.
> I had the impression that
> it is exact because during random sampling the number of pages is assumed
> to be known.
What makes you think that? And even more to the point, what makes
you think that we'd rely on relpages for such a purpose? I'd expect
a fresh RelationGetNumberOfBlocks call in any scan that had a need
to know the table size.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: