Re: Restore replication settings when modifying a field type

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Euler Taveira
Тема Re: Restore replication settings when modifying a field type
Дата
Msg-id CAH503wBz6re8o+JCRUNnobJ4kCCXR4-D0OnwRw2Z0m_=nh_g1g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Restore replication settings when modifying a field type  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Restore replication settings when modifying a field type  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 at 09:45, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 2020-02-11 00:38, Quan Zongliang wrote:
> new patch attached.

I didn't like so much how the updating of the replica identity was
hacked into the middle of ATRewriteCatalogs().  I have an alternative
proposal in the attached patch that queues up an ALTER TABLE ... REPLICA
IDENTITY command into the normal ALTER TABLE processing.  I have also
added tests to the test suite.

LGTM. Tests are ok. I've rebased it (because 61d7c7bce3686ec02bd64abac742dd35ed9b9b01). Are you planning to backpatch it? IMHO you should because it is a bug (since REPLICA IDENTITY was introduced in 9.4). This patch can be applied as-is in 12 but not to other older branches. I attached new patches.

Regards,


--
Euler Taveira                 http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager