Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wzn6pGXE-0vwwVbGZ--+qACd8D0ArqfZx7k05XaibAaFrQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 6:37 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> It would be awkward if we just used nBlocksWritten within
> LogicalTapeSetBlocks() in the case where we didn't preallocate (or in
> all cases). Not entirely sure what to do about that just yet.

I guess that that's the logical thing to do, as in the attached patch.

What do you think, Jeff?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allow ERROR from heap_prepare_freeze_tuple to be downgraded to WARNING
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Division in dynahash.c due to HASH_FFACTOR