Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> This seems like it'd be quite a different tool than amcheck, though.
> Also, it would only find broken-HOT-chain corruption, which might be
> a rare enough issue to not deserve a single-purpose tool.

FWIW, my ambition for amcheck is that it will have checks for a large
variety of invariants that involve the heap, and related SLRU
structures such as MultiXacts. Though, that would probably necessitate
code written by other people that are subject matter experts in areas
that I am not.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan