Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WzmDtfc4FpE-tU=5n=k34tUSwOX498GKDcyYj-1G_fQvLQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:21 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Still waiting for some review of the first patch, to get it out of the
> way. Anastasia?

I plan to commit this first patch [1] in the next day or two, barring
any objections.

It's clear that the nbtree "pin scan" VACUUM code is totally
unnecessary -- it really should have been fully removed by commit
3e4b7d87 back in 2016.

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAH2-WzkWLRDzCaxsGvA_pZoaix_2AC9S6%3D-D6JMLkQYhqrJuEg%40mail.gmail.com#daed349a71ff9d7ac726cc0e3e01a436
-- 
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: non-exclusive backup cleanup is mildly broken
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: non-exclusive backup cleanup is mildly broken