Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wzkrowjc2v-DML0zA2gHF=+KzFvodoyPKR-4hLND7XVZsQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 9:32 AM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andres has suggested in the past that we allow maintenance_work_mem be
> set to a lower value or introduce some kind of development GUC so that
> we can more easily test multiple pass index vacuuming. Do you think
> this would be worth it?

No, I don't.

--
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates
Следующее
От: Nathan Bossart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping