Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin
Дата
Msg-id 890165.1721663393@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 9:32 AM Melanie Plageman
> <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Andres has suggested in the past that we allow maintenance_work_mem be
>> set to a lower value or introduce some kind of development GUC so that
>> we can more easily test multiple pass index vacuuming. Do you think
>> this would be worth it?

> No, I don't.

I don't see why that's not a good idea.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Enhance pg_dump multi-threaded streaming (WAS: Re: filesystem full during vacuum - space recovery issues)