On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:28 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Don't think I like ecpg's tests behaving differently in this respect
> than the rest of them do; that seems like a recipe for unrecognized
> security issues.
>
> If nobody can think of a positive reason for pg_regress not to
> unset PGDATABASE unconditionally, let's try that and see how it
> goes.
It would be nice to get this fixed. Several people have been confused
by it at this point.
--
Peter Geoghegan