Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WzkC0nV+-2h+yQXSfRGoxr0D1c+eNTS2qKD6gapV0NFnFA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 2:44 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> If this is the problem (although I think we'd find that OID collisions
> are rather rare compared to other gratuitous cfbot failures), why not
> have the cfbot build with a flag that ignores OID collisions?

How would that work?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?