Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=k__9sVGf=0aozdtEUeehOWvcSZZN4FS2J9A1ewNyC3g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> I suppose you'll need two tuplestores for the ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE
> case -- one for updated tuples, and the other for inserted tuples.

Also, ISTM that the code within ENRMetadataGetTupDesc() probably
requires more explanation, resource management wise.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Re: GSoC 2017 weekly progress reports ("Explicitly support predicatelocks in index access methods besides b-tree")
Следующее
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 : Proposal for predicate locking in gist index